The next day Ewald flew to New
York to give a speech at Cooper Union. He chose the site because of its historical
significance. A little more than one hundred sixty years before, Abraham
Lincoln had delivered an address at the same hall. The country was threatened
with dissolution when Lincoln
spoke, and the threat of disunion hung over the country as Ewald stepped to the
podium.
The New England
states and Pennsylvania and New
York were threatening to leave the union rather to be
a part of Rightway's Christian country.
If they left, then Ewald would have no choice but to seek California's
separation from the union. Washington
and Oregon promised to follow if
he did, and there would be at least three countries where one had flourished.
There was no threat of Civil War,
for each of the sections had control over nuclear weapons based there, making
the possibility of reunification by force unlikely, even for someone as
fanatical as Reverend Rightway. But
there would be little harmony and co-operation between the two smaller
countries and the larger Christian States
of America, as
Rightway was now calling his new country.
"Lincoln
once stood on this stage where I am now standing," Ewald told the
gathering. “His mission that day was to
find someway of holding the union together without compromising on the issue of
slavery. Our mission is just as
important and momentous as his was. We
must find someway of preserving our country without ceding the cherished right
to religious freedom.
"It may seem strange to you
to see me become one of the most vehement defenders of the union when only
fifteen months ago I was one of the first to propose secession if the problems
of high unemployment and unrestricted immigration could not be resolved within
the present political framework. Today I find myself in the odd position of
arguing that I never would accept secession unless it was the only way of
preserving the basic rights of the citizens of my state.
"That may yet come to pass,
for there is a party in this country that is so convinced of the rightness of
their cause that they are willing to destroy anyone or anything that stands in
their path. We do not have to guess the
CRP's legislative agenda. They have
published it in vivid detail. They will
declare by law that ours is a Christian nation and anyone who is not a
Christian will be denied full citizenship.
They say they are willing to make one exception in the case of the Jews
because Christianity sprang from the seeds of Judaism.
"If I were a Jew, I would
take scant comfort in this supposed tolerance, for it will be only a momentary
respite. In time the old Anti-Semitism
that has always been a part of Christian fundamentalism in America
will seep into official doctrine, and one by one the Jews’ rights and privileges
will be taken away from them as surely as the CRP intends to take away the
rights and privileges of other non-believers now.
"Only Christians can claim
full citizenship in the Christian States
of America,
they tell us. Will someone tell me what
that statement means? What percentage of
citizenship is due to someone who is a Buddhist? Is it fifty-eight percent? If so, what does
that entitle him to? Will he be able to
vote? Send his children to college? Can he rely on the courts to respect his
rights in the event of a lawsuit?
“Will all non-Christians be
assigned the same percentage of citizenship or will there be a sliding scale
set up for various sets of non-believers with some enjoying more privileges of
citizenship than others? It is a
mind-boggling and horrifying prospect, this business of devising two or more
sets of rights based upon religious belief.
"We tried having two layers
of citizenship in our country before, and it was one of the most dismal periods
in our history. Separate but equal was its byword. There was little that was equal about that
arrangement. The oppression blacks
suffered diminished all of society. By
denying them the right to succeed and prosper, we limited our own success and
prosperity. The Civil Rights Movement of
the 1960's was as much an act of emancipation for the rest of society as it was
for blacks.
"Why should Christians be
concerned if the rights of non-believers are restricted or denied? First of all, because the Bible tells us that
we are our brothers’ keepers. Let us
make that one point perfectly clear.
What the Christian Religious Party is proposing is in direct
contradiction of the teachings of the Bible.
And secondly, because experience had shown us that in the long run the
only way we can preserve our rights is to protect and defend the rights of
others.
"If a Christian nation is
brought into existence, let me assure you that each year will bring new
refinements to its policies. New
heresies will be discovered. Old practices
will be proscribed. We have only to look at the experience of other countries
ruled by theocracies. No other forms of
government have been as successful at stamping out all traces of freedom of
expression as the clerical states have.