I’m not here to tell you all about the investing life of
Warren Buffett. What I will discuss
with you is how he uses just a few numbers from the Income Statement, at least
to an extent that we can understand and utilize in a very simplified
manner. Thus, this book will not go
into detail about Mr. Buffett. There
are so many wonderful books already written about him and every one of them I
read is certainly worth reading more than once. He has been called the World’s Greatest Investor and the Greatest
Investor of this century. Whatever we
call him, I know this for certain: we
all want to be like Warren.
A friend of mine who is an admirer of Buffett (like really,
who isn’t?) once told me that just before he (my friend) died, he hoped
Buffett’s life (and not his own) would flash in front of him.
We were sitting at a beachside bar in Florida, drinking one
or four beers when he mentioned flashing lives, so I wasn’t sure if he was
talking about Warren Buffett or Jimmy Buffett, but hey, we were happy talking about
stocks (like Warren) and watching the ocean (like Jimmy). After all, isn’t that the way it’s supposed
to be?
Now that we’ve discussed Warren Buffett’s life in such great
detail, let’s talk about numbers. After
all, I certainly believe that the numbers tell us almost everything we need to
know about a company. Let me clarify
this statement. If used properly,
the numbers will tell us almost everything we need to know about a company.
If used
properly, the numbers tell us almost everything we need to know about a
company.
If we use the correct numbers in the correct way, the bottom
line results will tell us which companies we want in our portfolio and which
companies should be in someone else’s portfolio. The problem is most analysts
out there in Investment Land are using the wrong numbers. But after you finish with this book, we
really won’t care about the analysts out there in Investment Land.
Where is the Investment Land of which I speak? Top of the tower of Big Ben at
midnight. Second star to the right and
fly away ‘til morning. Yes folks, many
analysts and portfolio managers really believe that Never Never Land is the
same place as Investment Land.
Most investment analysts use the wrong numbers for stock
selection. I know, I’ve taught many of the
present and future analysts in my college classes.
How do I know most investors are using the wrong numbers for
stock selection? I’m a college teacher
(my 3rd career). I teach my
students finance the way (well, almost) the academic community demands finance
be taught. My students then go out into
the real world and use these very methods taught to them by the academic
community. Most of the academic
community truly believes that if you know accounting and finance, then you know
how to select stocks for a portfolio.
Folks, this just ain’t necessarily so and I’ll teach you why
very soon. Let’s just say this for
now. As long as students are taught
finance by the present establishment and then go out and use this knowledge in
the investing community, Warren Buffett will always have job security as the
world’s greatest investor. Even in
Never Never Land.
Learning about finance and learning about investments are
two totally different subjects. The
problem is that most investment analysts don’t know this.
How do I know that the stock valuation models taught in
colleges and universities don’t work very well? If they did, all the college professors would be as rich as
Warren Buffett. And guess what? They’re not. They (the academics) think Buffett is just plain lucky. Oh believe me, the academic community has
all the answers to the “luck” syndrome, but the bottom line is even though
Buffett (and some others) have great track records, it doesn’t matter to the
academic community. Students just
aren’t taught the methods that produce the extraordinary results because in the
academic community extraordinary is considered luck and luck cannot be
predicted or tested through statistical analysis. But always remember what I say about luck. It is when opportunity meets preparation.
I’ve alluded to the
fact that Warren Buffett uses a method called Clean Surplus analysis. How do I know this? Please remember that I wrote and published a
several-hundred-page research paper (my dissertation) on the predictability of
Clean Surplus. Please trust me that I
know what Clean Surplus looks like when I see it.
One of the courses I teach at a nearby university is
entitled Advanced Managerial Finance.
The first case we analyze each semester is entitled “Warren E. Buffett,
1995.” Yes, and on page 15, Exhibit #5,
is a chart on Scott & Fetzer, which was a company purchased by our idol,
Warren Buffett. The chart came from the
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Annual Report, 1994, p.7. Well, the chart was a chart of the Clean Surplus method of
analysis. But it was very strange
because the author of the text did not mention anything about Clean
Surplus. In fact, the chart was just
sitting there alone with nothing much said about it. Just another exhibit in a case study designed to confuse the
student.
Ahh, but my students were not confused because they knew
what Clean Surplus looked like and they recognized the great importance of
Exhibit #5 on page 15. My students
understood what Warren Buffet saw in Scott& Fetzer and it is what you will
see in many stocks once you finish this book.
Clean Surplus
analysis is not taught in our fine business schools. This is why Warren Buffett has job security.
The second and even more important instance of War