Unitivity Theory
A Theory of Everything
by
Book Cover & Preview Text
A missing independent axiom leads to attempting an impossible task A fellow was walking down a very dark street. He took out his light-up-face watch to see what time it was. The watch just flipped out of his hands. He then proceeded down the block to a street light on the corner. Getting down on his knees, he started looking for his watch. A second person came along and asked him if he had lost something. He replied that he had lost his watch. They agreed it was big enough that they should be able to find it. After looking for some time without finding the watch, the second gentleman asked the first gentleman if he had any idea where he was standing when he lost it. He replied, “Back in the middle of this block.” He then added, “It was too dark back there to ever find it. So, I came to this street light so that I could see enough to find it.” The moral of the story is, “If the watch is not there, then you are not going to find it there.” By the same token, one cannot obtain a unified field theory, if a relevant, independent axiom that is required in the definition of our universe is missing. The reason this is true is that a unified field theory does not exist in an axiomatic system when a relevant independent axiom that it is based upon is missing. If it is not there, then you are not going to find it there. This point has been stated twice to emphasize its importance. Attempting a task where a required independent axiom is missing, is just like trying to put a jig-saw puzzle together when some pieces are missing. One is never going to be able to finish this impossible task. Formal axiomatic systems Formal axiomatic systems are good for looking in the dark because you do not need to know what an object looks like. One is mainly interested in the properties possessed by undefined objects. This is very advantageous when working in our universe with particles that are of the type associated with the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle or are of the type that puts them in the dark-energy category. The formal axiomatic system given in Chapter 10 produces events that occur in a manner consistent with our universe. However, there are a number of undefined terms that need to be defined in order to obtain a real model for this axiomatic system. This is accomplished by using a material axiomatic system to define our universe, and then employing this material axiomatic system to derive the basic structure of our universe, and finally to establish that the obtained universe is truly a real model for the formal axiomatic system. The material axiomatic system that is used for defining our universe is the following: Material axiomatic system that defines our universe axiom 1. For every action there is, simultaneously, an equal reaction or anti-action in the sense that if the two are combined, there is no action. axiom 2. For every change in energy there is, simultaneously, an equivalent change in anti-energy in the sense that if the two are combined, there is no change in total energy. axiom 3. Two different particles or energies cannot coexist, but they may appear to coexist.
Formats Book Details This book is the result of constantly wondering about gravity, magnetism, electricity, and light, and repeatedly employing mathematics, and physics, to reveal the hidden mystery of these and other phenomena of the universe. This book possesses two approaches to the universe, and each of these approaches conserves both energy and momentum. One of these approaches looks at the universe from the perspective of theoretical physics. The second approach looks at the universe from the perspective of axiomatic mathematics. The end product in each case is unitivity theory. Unitivity theory possesses phenomena consistent with the phenomena of our universe, and further, possesses not only a unified field theory, but also, a “unified theory of everything”. This “unified theory of everything” covers gravity, magnetism, electricity, light, force particles, quarks, charges, etc., and shows that all these have a common, unifying base. To the knowledge of the author, this is the first book to contain a derived theory that treats the whole universe in a unified way, and discloses that the universe is simple as one, two, four. The book also contains experimental results that support this new theory. One supporting example is run,11b, in which two steel balls bounce off from one another, and the magnitude of their combined momentum after the bounce is greater than it was before the bounce. In order to conserve action and anti-action, this event demands the existence of an ether-type space, a motor-type activity, and a type-two bounce that converts incoming momentum into outgoing momentum. All of these exist in unitivity theory. Also, it turns out that this type-two bounce is the mechanism that makes it easier to hit homeruns off fast pitched baseballs. The author of Unitivity Theory received a Ph D. in mathematics from
About the Book
About the Author
