The author claims that the USA and all other nations must change the way people have been living.
he need for this change was identified by the proof of God, a proof that the author found in 2005. This proof and related proofs led to the book —
The First Scientific Proof of God. Historically, the very first method of proving anything was sought in the early years of the 14th
century and when Aristotle’s science was challenged. This search for a proof was really a search for finding truths about God and the universe.
This search was fruitful because it led to the Italian Renaissance, ended the backward Middle Ages, and started the modern world. Eventually, this proof was found and, by the 17th
century, was named the ‘scientific method.’
However, the very first method of proof divided the fields of science and theology.
This division emerged because the very first method of proof could not find truths about God.
Thus, theologians were forced to find truths about God only by studying scriptures. Unfortunately, the ‘scientific method’ attracted nonphysical sciences such as psychology, medicine, politics, economy, etc.
However, the author concluded that the very first method of proof cannot be used to find truths about God or life.
So, the very first method of proof had to be improved if truths are to be found about God, life, and the universe.
The author found the necessary improvements that had to be made to the very first method of proof.
With these improvements, truths about God and life can be found.
Interestingly, these improvements indicate that the universe is very different from suggestions of the physical scientists today.
Thus, the author’s proof of God opens the human mind to a scientific method that would unify God, life, and the universe.
Furthermore, solutions to tough human problems such as crime, terrorism, peace, poverty, cancer, arbitrary governments, bipartisan politics, and religions differences will be found with the proof of God.
In his book, the author discusses the past and future of man. He identifies man’s past as a path to Hell.
With the path to Hell, he is able to define man’s path to Heaven. He identifies the ways that man can get on, and stay on, the path to Heaven.
If mankind decides merely to extend the past into the future, as liberals propose, the author predicts that man’s future life will be a life of wars, poverty, and mental degeneration.
He thus shows that the only path to Heaven is a spiritual life supported by a physical infrastructure.