Towards the Light

Within the Cosmic Intelligence there exists, in my opinion, an etheric communication means between all matter / energy within the universe. That this exists without limit in terms of distance and time. In other words the universe is a whole, and every person (whether currently physically alive or in a non material state), planet and atom is a component part of that whole.

I also believe that the universe is not a random creation, but a controlled creation linked in every respect. A belief that I hope to justify with logic later on in these writings.

Along with our subconscious mind we have a conscious mind which represents our individual self.  It is the possession of this fairly complex conscious mind that makes us fundamentally different from the other forms of life on this planet.

We are able to use our appreciation of our level of consciousness as a measure, to appreciate our degree of evolvement on the evolutionary scale, in comparison with both other forms of life, and with each other.

I am not trying to suggest that only great minds evolve. There may be innovators finding new routes, but the group mind effect (of which more later) can ensure that the rest of the human race (if willing participants) can also be carried along into a new reality.

If I am right in believing that it is our conscious mind that is the key to progress, then it is this that we must devote our efforts into developing. If we want to evolve further and start to control our own destiny.

We would need to train our conscious mind to gradually exert control over the subconscious mind, when and where we deem it necessary, and so change the limiting control programs that exist. This will start to adjust the current reality, and lead to us linking up more closely with, and tapping into, the Cosmic Intelligence.

After all, if the whole universe reduces to energy controlled by intelligence, then any reality is possible. Understanding and belief are the tools. There are of course many provisos to this in practice.

This in essence, and in a very few paragraphs, is how I believe we can evolve from human being into a more advanced being.

A simple analogy would be to visualise all forms of life as representing biologically constructed computers. Which basically is what life forms are. The only major difference being (apart form the method of construction) is that computers do not have the sense of self we call consciousness, and therefore lack the ability to take independent decisions and actions.

The lower forms of life have little ability to operate in anyway contrary to their inbuilt software programs, which were apparently created by evolution for the purpose of survival within their environment, and little else.

If one goes lower down the life form scale to insects or vegetation, there is presumably no sense of self, and no ability to override software.

A higher form of life (analogous with a future microcomputer?) such as a dog, has the ability to make minor decisions on behavior and action, with just enough self-programming control to override instinct (existing software?).

Humans representing the planet’s highest form of life (future mainframe?) have advanced independent control of self (self programming), and can override considerable areas of the built in software (sub consciousness?), which is there primarily to assist in the survival of the species, rather than the individual.

Much of the built in programs relate to control of body mechanisms, including defence and instinctive survival actions, as well as sexual drive for reproduction.

It is our self-programming ability that separates humans from other life forms. Indeed it is the scale of this ability that provides separation between one human and another.

It is not hard to identify people operating mainly on built in programs, who make little self-programming effort, and others who make huge efforts to create their own programs, and thus develop themselves.

If we accept that evolution exists only to perpetuate the species, and that we have to start experimenting with major self-development programming, then we quickly recognise that, like real computer software, there are an awful lot of lousy programs in existence. Which may explain a little of why we are making such a mess of running this world.

From such a fairly crude analogy, is it such a giant step to visualise the eventual more advanced human overriding all limiting built in software?  Software which, because it was only designed for the survival of the species, did not have to provide for an extended life span which would allow us to take total control of our development in any direction, without limitations.

Getting back to terra firma, I have to emphasise that I am only making an analogy, which contains not a small fraction of the whole truth, but does seem to me to represent the gist of what I am trying to express.