SUSAN, WOMAN OF FAITH
Susan may have come a long way by this time or she may be thoroughly
confused. She possibly began with a
belief in a creator god who is in charge of everything that happens in the
universe since its creation from nothing at the word of god; a god who manages
the lives and experiences of each of its creatures, theoretically for their own
good, but often in rather strange ways;
who can be petitioned to intervene or to change god's mind about things
that are happening in our lives; who
showed care and concern by becoming one of us in the person of Jesus; and who is now accessible in the sacraments
of the church in a quasi-magic manner.
Now she is presented with a god who had nothing to
do with the coming-into-being of the universe; has no control over its physical
evolution; and should not be petitioned in prayer to change the physical
circumstances of her life because there is nothing god can directly do about
them. Her understanding of Jesus as the
physical presence of god will have to be radically altered from the relatively
simple “union of two natures” to a complex theory of transignification based on
reality as defined by the laws of quantum mechanics. And nothing, absolutely nothing, can be empirically proven, but
is all a matter of faith. For this the
believers do not apologize for they are still convinced with as much certitude
that there is a god as that there is a universe matching the description that
their brain develops. They have
experienced sensory information and developed an understanding of their
environment that works for them.
Presumably, since our brains are all about the same, our perception of
the universe is about the same, though as we know from the effects of illness
or injury to the brain, this is not universally true. It is also true that different cultures may inspire its members
to experience things differently than those in another culture. Still, there is much about the universe that
we do not perceive that is nevertheless true and much about the universe that
we think we perceive that is not true.
It is all based on what has impacted us and what we have absorbed from
these encounters. This is true whether
we are talking of the universe or of god since I conjecture that there is some
means whereby god can be perceived by our consciousness. This point of contact is so subtle and so
tenuous and so liable to be misinterpreted by the still-primitive equipment
inside our heads that it is a far cry from the god we thought we knew was
obviously the ground and reason for all other being and whose presence can be
experienced in a blade of grass. Though
we might wish for the god we used to have, after further inquiry we discover
that the god we are “left with” is far greater and far more valuable to us than
the god we lost. The former faith
inevitably led us to the contradiction of a god who loves and yet is ultimately
responsible for the evil that we also experience in our lives. There is nothing negative about the god that
this reinvestigation leads us to. While
this god may seem rather puny and relatively impotent compared with the god who
can stop or start a volcano, it turns out that, as the faith really always
said, this god is effective in the one way which we really need. We do not need to be protected from life and
from the universe but to fulfill our role in it to the maximum, both
individually and collectively. This is
precisely what god is interested in helping us to do, for the more we become,
the more we learn, and the more god learns as well, as the parameters of
“being” are expanded. True, many die
with little chance to grow, and no human dies perfect, but these things are not
god’s will. While the best of all
possible worlds would be one in which god took this role of guide and counselor
as well as the role of controller, fashioning a universe that fitted our needs,
and in which everyone could develop all their potential, this is not what we
have and we must live with it. Still,
with a god who is a sojourner with us, we can enjoy the journey as best the
circumstances allow. Further, and this
is particularly important for those of us who are not fortunate enough to live
a life formerly called “blessed”, there is still the hope/knowledge that god is
in sympathy with us and is still/always in love with us and will make it
possible to live a life worth living when this sometimes miserable but always
potentially wonderful one is over. Then
we will live an existence that god does indeed create in “heaven,” the “reign
of god,” the “new creation.”