As you have already noticed, the text reads a little
different from the common readings that we have heard all our lives. And that is mainly due to the fact that the
verb forms that have been supplied in the common translations, such as “blessed
are the poor in spirit,” and “blessed
are those who mourn,” have been added
to make the reading smoother. They
aren’t in the text. And they aren’t
there for a reason.
And the reason is that Jesus is making a declaration
of fact – or judgment of fact. The
apostle isn’t saying that men exist in blessedness because of some intrinsic
value in these eight things listed here.
But he does say that Jesus has
pronounced – or judged – or declared – men to be blessed who are described by
these eight qualities. “Blessed the
poor in spirit.”
So Matthew has made a studied, grammatical decision,
quoting the Lord Jesus, to let everyone know the Gospel – that Jesus Christ
pronounces men blessed. The state of
being blessed occurs naturally in no
man; either by being naturally meek in character or lowly in spirit. Neither do reviling, persecution, being poor
and beggarly, or acting as a peacemaker make one blessed. Blessed
is a judgment of Christ – it is a pronouncement of the King on His Own
subjects. A man in mourning over his
own state of life is naturally driven from
Christ into his own sin and degradation.
But one over whom Christ rules mourns his own sin. And the King pronounces him blessed.
Our Lord begins the great Sermon on the Mount by
making a clear distinction between His Kingdom and the world order. His preaching had begun – “Repent, for the
Kingdom of the Heavens is at hand.” And
this sermon, chapter 5-7, is an exposition of that. What does it mean to repent and be in submission to the King, and
live in His realm – the Kingdom, God, Heavens, Lord – interchangeable. What happens when a sinful head of household
sees the depravity that is there and then turns to obey the words of the King? What happens when an employer finally
“sees,” and submits to every word that flows through the mouth of God?
Now, there are many different views out there
concerning the sermon of the mount, as it is called. Jesus preached repentance, and He preached the Kingdom. The nature of man, and his obedience to the
King. And every aberrant view of the
sermon leaves out one or both of these two elements.
I just want to touch on a few of these, by way of
explanation, so that you can see what I mean.
For example, there is the view that leaves out a
clear exegesis, or exposition of each and every verse in the sermon, and
exegesis of the whole, preferring to “summarize” the sermon by choosing a few
particularly pertinent verses – such as the “golden rule.” Do unto others as you would have them do
unto you, (or some variation on it).
And the idea is that if everybody treats his neighbor right, then we’ll
have the great society.
Now, this is called the social gospel in which, I
suppose, there is some loose form of a kingdom concept, but certainly not the
Kingdom of Christ. And there is no
understanding of depravity or repentance – without which sin and degradation
will continue to run rampant. And for
that reason the social Gospel does not work!
Another view, which is, perhaps, a little more
serious for us as reformed people, is that the sermon is an elaboration of the
Mosaic Law. But this is a pharisaical,
law-and-order interpretation of it which leads to autocracy, tyranny and human
abuse. I will say a lot about Jesus’
exposition of the Law and its Kingdom application from time to time, but, for
now, it is enough to say that this approach to the Sermon on the Mount
completely omits Jesus’ preaching of repentance first. And without it the law and order approach to
society only culminates in an abusive wielding of the sword. Freedom disappears when men usurp the reign
and realm of the true King, and install their own aberrant views of the Law.
The next interpretation that I want to mention is
one that’s very popular today – in fact, most
of the thousands of evangelical churches out there believe it in some form or
another, and it’s taught from many, many
pulpits and TV programs.
And it says that the Sermon on the Mount has nothing
whatsoever to do with modern Christians.
They say our Lord began to preach the Kingdom of God, but the Jews
didn’t believe Him. They rejected the
Kingdom preaching. So Jesus, at that
point, went ahead and submitted to death on the cross, and couldn’t, therefore
continue to preach and establish the Kingdom.
So the Church age came to pass – and that will persist up to a certain
point in history. Then our Lord will return with the Kingdom and the Se